Information Desk Service Guidelines June 1999
Research Services
Social Sciences and Humanities Library
The following guidelines present standards for information service performance. They should be used to maintain a high-level of service.
It is recognized that each information provider brings his/her own sense of style and personality to the provision of information service. The following guidelines serve as a foundation for our group goal which is to provide excellent information service and have a positive impact on the patron.
Information Desk Service Guidelines
1. Approachability
The patron must be able to identify that the information provider is available to provide assistance and must feel comfortable asking the staff member for help. The staff member's role is to make the patron feel at ease in a situation which may be perceived as intimidating, risky, confusing, and/or overwhelming. To be approachable, the information provider:
A successful information provider must demonstrate a high degree of interest in the reference transaction. To show interest, the information provider:
The reference interview is the heart of the reference transaction. The information provider must be effective in identifying the patron’s information needs, but must do so in a manner that puts the patron at ease. As a good communicator, the information provider:
3.1 Uses an appropriate tone of voice and treats the patron with respect.
4. Locating the Information
As an effective information locator, the information provider:
4.7 Attempts to conduct the search with the patron in the allotted time frame which is influenced by the following variables:
If none of the above variables apply, the maximum time allotted per transaction should not exceed ten minutes.
4.8 Accompanies the patron at least in the initial stages of the search process.
4.10 Works with the patron, after the initial search, to narrow or broaden the topic when too little or too much information is identified.
4.11 Provides guides to patrons who indicate they would like to work independently.
5. Follow-up
The information provider is responsible for determining if the patron is satisfied with the results of the search and is also responsible for referring the patrons to other sources, even when those sources are not available in the local library. For a successful follow up, the information provider:
5.2 Recognizes when to refer a patron to a more appropriate service point and unit within the UCSD Libraries and local libraries following the guidelines in the Information Desk Manual. (see Works Cited #1 below.)
5.3 Provides as much information as necessary to facilitate the process such as: providing an address, phone number, directions on how to reach the establishment when referring a patron to another service point or library.
5.4 Encourages the patron to return to the information desk if they have any additional questions.
6. Other Topics Related to Service
The effective information provider:
Works Cited:
Bruno’s Laws
--Phil Smith, Reference Librarian Extraordinaire
Anything about anyone. Typically, the user who says "I’ve looked in the catalog and you don’t have the book" or the colleague who says "I’ve checked every conceivable source." Skepticism as process.
Pointing has its place, Emily Post to the Contrary, but the skilled librarian never simply points the user to a complex or iffy source. If there is any doubt that the user might run into problems, MOVE.
During the reference interview, it often turns out that the question is reformulated. This is fine, but take care to respond to the question as asked. Example:
Original question: "Where are the books on England?"
Reformulated question: "Where can I find information on the Gunpowder Plot?"
Somewhere early in the interview if possible, indicate that if the user truly does wish to browse the stacks, many books on England can be found the DA section on the fifth floor. In this way he/she perceives that the request for help has been fully heard.
Not terribly interesting anyway. If you’re absorbed, with head lowered, you’ll appear to be unapproachable.
This applies to questions you feel could have been answered better, even if the user has long since left the building. For several reasons: Sometimes the user returns. The question, or one like it, will probably come up again. It’s good device for testing new sources ("I wish I’d known about this last week.") A back burner, for odd moments on a rainy Tuesday, is a fine device.
If you tell someone to look under the main entry, the chances are good that he/she will find it – and leave it.
No one will be offended by this standard practice.
The desk shift should be approached for the fun and challenge that it is.